Employee quits job after manager refuses to give them a raise, later finds out manager hired a less skilled replacement for a higher salary: ‘What's the point?’

Advertisement
  • 01
    Cheezburger Image 10520604416
  • 02

    Manager refused to give me a 10k salary rise, but hired a less skilled employee for 15k more than my salary. What's the point?

    Hi, I have an office job. I'm very skilled at it and I'm in good terms with everyon* in the office. Few month ago I had my annual
  • 03
    performance review and got a perfect score. So I asked a 10k salary rise. I was offered 3k (that is basically a salary
    via ThrowRAmiss04
  • 04
    deduction considering inflation). I refused and gave my 2 weeks because I can actually find another low salary job (a job with
    via ThrowRAmiss04
  • 05
    the extra 10k will be hard, but one with my actual salary is nothing special). This week a coworker told me that they hired my
    via ThrowRAmiss04
  • 06
    replacement for 15k more than my salary. But he has not much experience, so he will have to spent several weeks in formation
    via ThrowRAmiss04
  • 07
    only. What's the point in letting me leave and hiring someone less experienced and at an higher salary? I could understand if they
    via ThrowRAmiss04
  • 08
    hired someone very experienced or at a lower salary than mine, but this situation is no sense
    via ThrowRAmiss04
  • 09
    introitusawaitus You challenged their authority and they are intimidated that you know your worth. So now their only choice is to hire
    via introitusawaitus
  • 10
    someone, even at a higher payscale, rather than to admit you were the best option. Keeping face is far too important than admitting a s v up.
    via introitusawaitus
  • 11
    spiritfiend Your employer was bluffing and you called the bluff. They will have to pay more money and you win by not having to work for that a__hole.
    via spiritfiend
  • 12
    seanugengar Promotion nowadays, is finding a new job
    via seanugengar
  • 13
    Cheezburger Image 10520604672
    via Studio4
  • 14
    ML1948 It's simple. If they rewarded loyalty, it would mean paying everyone who stays more money.
    via ML1948
  • 15
    By underpaying everyone who stays and only paying to attract new talent, they save money. This works because most people hate job searching and change.
    via ML1948
  • 16
    The companies exploit this. Loyalty is financially punished because on average it makes the company more money stiffing all their employees and rewarding "job- hoppers".
    via ML1948
  • 17
    armoredphoenix1 More money allocated towards recruiting than retention.
    via armoredphoenix1
  • 18
    Tremolat Switching jobs is the only guaranteed way to get substantial raises. A year after landing a job, start searching for another.
    via Tremolat
  • 19
    No-To-Newspeak My son told me that the only way to increase your salary and your position is to change companies. Youll rise same much higher and
    via No-To-Newspeak
  • 20
    faster than if you stay in the same place. Internal raises will always be lower than the starting salary at somewhere new.
    via No-To-Newspeak
  • 21
    JohnCasey3306 Sounds like new guy actually negotiated on his way in, as everyone here should do. Ignore any advertised salary range, it's
    via JohnCasey3306
  • 22
    meaningless, it's what they'd like to pay. Negotiate for the contract you want I earned 30% more than my colleagues in the same role because they accepted the advertised salary range.
    via JohnCasey3306
  • 23
    ROMULUX The point is companies are so afraid of people unionizing, they need a revolving door
    via ROMULUX

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article